![]() |
| / Mobilise! / Issue 18 (May 1987) / Page 5 | Email page link | Print this page | ||
(From previous page) |
||
|
Quackery is defined as... "using non-proven methods for a profit"... so I ask, "who are the real quacks anyway?"... and the answer is that 80 to 90 percent of medicine practised by conventional and allopathic health practitioners is "quackery"! Much of the enlightenment of the extremely cruel vivisection portion of this cartel is revealed in the writings of Hans Ruesch in both Slaughter of the Innocent and Naked Empress. These two books have suffered international suppression but yet the truth is available to the seeker! Vivisection is a paramount symptom of the "greed disease" and of the inhuman, unscientific, ignorant individuals who perpetuate it throughout the world. Briefly, drugs are proven "safe and effective by animal research" and then spread upon the consumer frequently to cause even further illness, physical and/or mental disability, and even death. From my observations there is, as the opposition frequently states, "no scientific proven basis" for the use of drugs in humans based on animal studies. Animals are not human beings and do not react in a similar fashion to a drug. What might be beneficial in an animal might be lethal to the human, and conversely. Where is the logic to transfer information from animal experimentation to human usage of toxic chemicals? |
||
|
It is in the pocketbooks of the members of the conspiracy of the greed disease! Let's briefly cite some of the drug fiascos! DES was used to prevent miscarriages and has resulted in damage to the male and female second generations. The new arthritic drugs, Oraflex, Zomax, Feldene and Butazolidin have killed hundreds of people. The antibiotic Chloramphenicol has been another killer and still available through doctors' prescriptions look at what Thalidomide did with severe birth defects with a condition called phocomelia. Yet this drug was approved after animal studies. Hindsight reveals that humans are 60 times more sensitive to it than mice. 100 times more sensitive than rats, 200 times more sensitive than dogs, and seven hundred times more sensitive than hamsters... all favourite test animals: Does it make sense?.... (Roy Kupsinel M.D.) April 1987 |
| < Previous | Contents | Next > | ^ Top | ||
| Home | About | Mobilise! | Materials | Links | Contact |